Bernard Moitt - Caribbean Slavery
 
Impromptu "Read-In" by 1999 Seminarians in Cheek House Great Room 
    One of the unique features of the Stratford Hall Seminar experience is the existence of a home specifically dedicated to housing those here for educational projects.  The thirty seminarians share 15 rooms, and often gather in the great room of the Cheek for conversation and fellowship.

     On Monday night, Dr. Bernard Moitt was visiting the Cheek great room, and the seminarians there began to read aloud the assigned reading for his presentation  on Tuesday.  As they each took their turns reading, he gently corrected the mangling of the French verbiage they encountered.

    Dr.  Moitt was able to build on the sharing of the materials in the Cheek house the night before in his lecture on Tuesday.  Because his area of study is the French slavery in the Caribbean, the texts that we were asked to read were difficult because of the French terms that had not daunted most seminarians since collegiate days.

 This same language barrier has caused a delay in the important study of the French Caribbean system of slavery.  Dr. Moitt says to study racism in the United States, study the Caribbean slave system since it is an earlier system and it can shed light on its influence on the emergence of the system here.

     Dr. Bernard's research fills in important gaps in the system.  The Caribbean system was brutal and harsh with slave masters free to act with impunity.  One of Dr. Moitt's studies involves slave women and he documented the brutality of the system toward women.  The diary of Thomas Thistlewood, a Jamaican slave owner who detailed his sexual assaults on female slaves, is representative of the capricious and brutal nature of the French slavery.

    This brutality was not able to stamp out the African culture completely, and great remnants of the African culture remains.  Voodoo, for example, comes from West African state, Dahomey. Obeh is also an African religion.  Indicative of the spiritualism of the enslaved Africans.

    The Haitian 1791 revolution that threw off the French Slave system was the only successful revolution in world history, but it is not recognized or studied as such.  Nor has the legacy of that revolution produced a modern society that evinces the national growth such a freedom would be thought to engender.  Other Caribbean societies tried to emulate this, but were unsuccessful.

    Bernard hopes for more research and acknowledgment of these efforts and individuals such as Jean Jacques Dessalines a general who took over after Toussaint Louverture was betrayed by the French.
 
        He  thinks that the history of mixture of races and large numbers of blacks contribute to what he sees as a more tolerant racial relationship among Caribbean races than in the United States.  The problem in the U.S. is racism.  It does not exist in the same way as it does in the United States.   Here we have to live with the day to day basis  that does not exist in the Caribbean.